By. Kevin P. Chavous
On Saturday, the Obama Administration sued to block
Louisiana’s Scholarship Program. This unprecedented and uncalled for action is
a direct attack on thousands of low-income children. AFC Press release (http://bit.ly/15bWLvi).
As Adam Emerson, from Fordham summarizes it:
Why?
Because, according to the DOJ lawsuit, only a federal judge should be able to allow a poor black child to leave the failing school district. That’s right, it’s not up to the parent, but a federal judge.
As the Time Picayune
reported:
This is absurd, it is obscene, and it reeks of political
gamesmanship.
Every time a parent raises their hand and wants to offer
their child a better educational option, the unions, the education associations
and the elitists try to slap them down.
More from the Time
Picayune:
In other words, this is another stall and delay tactic from
the very same union that opposes educational choice.
The legal action by the Obama Administration is not about
providing children with a better education, it is not meant to protect civil
rights. No. The actions by this lawsuit are part of the stall and delay tactic
that will result in poor kids remaining in failing schools, with little to no
options.
And, why? All in the name of desegregation.
The Louisiana Scholarship Program is tailored made for
children who come from low-income families and assigned to failing schools.
- 91 percent of the children participating in the Louisiana Scholarship Program are a minority
- 86 percent of the children participating in the Louisiana Scholarship Program are African American
Sadly, this political attack on school kids is transparent
and it amounts to nothing more than President Obama telling poor and minority kids
in Louisiana that they must remain separate and not equal.
It would be too cliché to quote Dr. King’s speech about his
children walking hand in hand with a white child to school.
The true King legacy is to expand rights and grow
opportunities for all Americans, particularly those of color who were
systematically denied the American dream. In taking the action he did against
the children of Louisiana, the President does a disservice to that legacy by
taking away the promise of a quality education for our most vulnerable
citizens.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThe Justice Department's suit shows an out-of-date mentality towards contemporary American society. Economic segregation is a greater problem today than racial segregation (although the two often go hand-in-hand), and taking away a family's right to seek a better education for their children merely on the basis of their having the misfortune to live in a zip code under a court order is to privilege the government's right to control racial demographics over the family's right to their children's freedom of education, and reinforces their poverty and misery, which Dr. King sympathized with but Mr. Holder ignores.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your post. This is excellent information. It is amazing and wonderful to visit your site. It really gives me an insight on this topic.
ReplyDeleteconstruction