Policy Director
American Federation for Children
In
some circles, much is being made of the recently released legislative audit of
Louisiana’s Scholarship Program, a statewide voucher program that allows
low-income families with children zoned to attend failing public schools the
option to attend a participating private school or high-performing public
school of their choice.
Currently, about 6,750 such students are participating
in the program, 86 percent of
whom are African-American. These are kids who need educational options. It is
worth keeping in mind that a multi-year, scientifically-based evaluation of a similar school choice programin Florida has consistently found that the scholarship program in that state
serves students who “tend to come from
lower-performing public schools prior to entering the program. Likewise, as in
prior years, they tend to be among the lowest-performing students in their
prior school, regardless of the performance level of their public school.”
The legislative
audit itself makes clear the high demand for the program – student
participation increased 269 percent from school year 2011-12 2013-14, the two
years since the program was expanded to serve students statewide beyond Orleans
Parish – including a 38 percent jump in enrollment since last year.
The audit makes three main recommendations, namely
that the Louisiana Department of Education (LDOE) should:
- Develop specific criteria for determining whether schools have both the academic and physical capacity to serve the number of scholarship students they request;
- Develop more specific criteria for removing a school from the program based on academic performance; and
- Mandate that participating school separately account for their scholarship funds and place schools on probation when they fail to comply with the audit provisions.
By digging into
the audit and reading LDOE’s response to the specific recommendations, it is clear just how much the LDOE is
committed to implementing the program well. The Louisiana Scholarship Program is
a nationwide leader among educational choice programs on the strength of its
academic transparency and accountability. One can see from the LDOE’s response
to the three audit recommendations that the Department is willing to address
identified weaknesses and has already moved to strengthen fiscal requirements
of participating schools.
As LDOE points
out in its response to Recommendation 1, when a school requests to increase
their scholarship enrollment by 50 or more new students or 125 percent of total
enrollment, the Department must review the school’s demonstrated capacity to
effectively serve students. LDOE notes that in “the year audited, 54 out of 118
participating schools made such requests and received such reviews.” However,
LDOE agrees with the recommendation and states that they “are committed to
continuously increasing the efficiency and rigor of the school capacity review
process.”
In disagreeing
with Recommendation 2 regarding the need for more specific criteria for barring
a school based on academic performance, LDOE states that in 2012-13, the
Department barred seven schools from taking on new students due to poor
academic performance. In doing so, they “used specific, quantitative
criteria…participation in the program for at least two years, at least 10
tested students, and proficiency ratings of less than 25 percent.” Looks like
LDOE has this one under control.
The audit’s Recommendation
3 relates to financial accountability and essentially says that participating
schools should be required to account separately for their scholarship funds
and place schools on probation when they fail to comply with the audit
provisions. The Department partially agrees with the recommendation stating
that “while the law does not mandate that schools separately account for
scholarship funds, in 2013-14, the Department has required participating
schools to separately account for the scholarship funds either through the use
of a separate bank account for scholarship funds or segregated accounting
within the schools’ accounting systems.” LDOE has already addressed the issue
of requiring that participating schools separately account for their
scholarship funds for this current 2013-14 school year forward.
All and all,
this is certainly not a “sky is falling audit.” LDOE can, and is, tightening up
requirements and implementation procedures to make the Louisiana Scholarship
Program more accountable, but there is nothing damning in this audit.
No comments:
Post a Comment