But what many
opponents to education reform forget is that education is not about a certain
system, government bureaucracy, or politics.
Education reform is about providing an education for every child in
America, because having access to a quality K-12 education is a right, not a privilege. As a nation, we believe in the equality of
opportunity—the opportunity for any person to achieve their dreams. We don’t believe in systems, we believe in
learning.
Public education
fulfills that need for lots of families; but others are left behind and don’t
receive the quality education that can transform a life. So it our duty to ensure that children have
other options.
It's with that in mind that we came across a Washington Post blog post by Diane Ravitch, who asked
if school choice will kill public education. The answer, very clearly, is no.
Ravitch commented that if education becomes a consumer choice, that community members will not want to pay for other’s education. She writes:
It is our responsibility as citizens to support a high-quality public education, even
if we don’t have children in the public schools.
But once the concept of private choice becomes dominant,
then the sense of communal responsibility is dissolved. Each of us is then
given permission to think of what is best for me, not what is best for we.
The school choice
movement is both about society providing a high-quality education for all
children and allowing students to access the education that works for that
student. Allowing choice will not
diminish our civic sense of providing education. Individual choice and real educational
options are both strong civic duties.
- American Federation for Children | Alliance for School Choice, MSG
- American Federation for Children | Alliance for School Choice, MSG
No comments:
Post a Comment