“[T]he unions have already lost several
court bids to delay the voucher program until the lawsuit plays out. Hence, the
bullying.”
In ‘Whatever
Means Necessary,’ the editorial board rightly points out that not only do
vouchers work, but there is overwhelming demand in the Bayou State:
Demand for vouchers has been
overwhelming: There were 10,300 applications for 5,600 slots. Despite claims to
the contrary by school-choice opponents, low-income parents can and do act
rationally when it comes to the education of their children.
[…]
The unions claim that vouchers don't
benefit students, but we know from school-choice programs in Washington, D.C.,
and elsewhere that voucher recipients attend safer schools and enjoy higher
graduation rates than their peers in public schools.
Most poignant is the real reason that
unions support that status quo and oppose vouchers, according to The Wall Street Journal:
The real reason that unions oppose
vouchers has nothing to do with the impact on students and everything to do
with the impact on teachers unions. The Louisiana Association of Educators
doesn't want students taught by nonunion teachers—even if that means suing in
court to make it illegal for a kid in a failing school to attend another school
where he might learn something.
We must stop bullying and we must put
our children first when it comes to education policy—and the voucher program
does just that.
- American Federation for Children | Alliance for School Choice, MSG
- American Federation for Children | Alliance for School Choice, MSG
No comments:
Post a Comment